US District Court for the Western District of Michigan Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 255
Taillard v. Rooto Corporation, The
as 1:2016cv01258
Plaintiff:
Michael Taillard
Defendant:
Rooto Corporation, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Lee v. Merial Vaccination Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01041
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lee
Defendant:
Merial Vaccination Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lanius et al v. Rage Enterprise, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00893
Plaintiff:
Ryan Lanius and Heidi Lanius
Defendant:
Rage Enterprise, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ochampaugh et al v. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv00674
Plaintiff:
William Ochampaugh and Deborah Ochampaugh
Defendant:
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation , Advanced Energy, LLC and Walker-Neer Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
McCardle v. Carlisle Food Service Products Incorporated et al
as 1:2016cv00232
Plaintiff:
Lisa Patterson McCardle
Defendant:
Carlisle Food Service Products Incorporated, Carlisle Companies Incorporated and Dinex International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaminski v. The Libman Company
as 2:2016cv00042
Defendant:
The Libman Company
Plaintiff:
Robert Kaminski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaminski v. The Libman Company
as 1:2016cv00158
Defendant:
The Libman Company
Plaintiff:
Robert Kaminski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reed et al v. Real Flame Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00154
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Reed and Sandra Snow
Defendant:
Real Flame Company, Inc. and Moda Flame, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nash v. Ariens Company et al
as 1:2016cv00056
Plaintiff:
Linda M. Nash
Defendant:
Ariens Company , The Home Depot and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Karber et al v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00780
Plaintiff:
James Karber
Defendant:
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
