US District Court for the Western District of Michigan Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 31
United States of America v. 901 California St., NW
as 1:2007cv00358
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
901 California St., NW, Grand Rapids, Michigan, Kent County, Real Property Commonly Known As
Claimant:
Maria Quintino, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Robert R. Rangel
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $10,753.00 United States Currency et al
as 1:2006cv00817
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $69,500 in US Currency
as 2:2006cv00132
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Fifth Third Bank Checking Account Number 7163292746 et al
as 1:2005cv00810
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. 1515 Jaydonna Drive, Charlotte, Michigan, Eaton County, Real Property Commonly Known As
as 1:2005cv00630
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. 64981 M-40 Highway, Lawton, Antwerp Township, Van Buren County, Michigan
as 1:2005cv00403
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
United States of America v. 29169 CR 388, Gobles, Michigan, Van Buren County, Pine Grove Township, Real Property Commonly Known As
as 1:2004cv00128
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $47,550.00 in United States Currency
as 1:2004cv00099
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Antique Furniture, Assorted et al
as 1:2002cv00266
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. 12681 Sisar Road, Ojai, California, Ventura County
as 1:2002cv00262
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.