US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 10,409
White v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al.
as 1:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Jason White
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, CO Kristen Dreezen, CO Brandon Waller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malvasi v. Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
as 4:2024cv00474
Petitioner:
Michael Malvasi
Respondent:
Warden David W. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Bowers Towing et al.
as 5:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Anderson
Defendant:
Bowers Towing and Akron Police Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Ross v. USA
as 1:2024cv00429
Petitioner:
Benjamin Ross
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Peterson v. USA
as 1:2024cv00418
Petitioner:
Deon Peterson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Filing Error
as 5:2024cv00416
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jones v. USA
as 3:2024cv00411
Petitioner:
Robert Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lumpkin Jr. v. Core Civic Northeast Ohio Correctional Center
as 4:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Lumpkin Jr.
Defendant:
Core Civic Northeast Ohio Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnoff v. Ferguson
as 5:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Bruce Arnoff
Defendant:
Denise Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
King v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00387
Petitioner:
Richard N. King
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
