US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Labor Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Airline Professionals Association, Teamsters Local Union 1224 v. ABX Air, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00820
Plaintiff:
Airline Professionals Association, Teamsters Local Union 1224 and Airline Professionals Association, Teamsters Local Union 1224
Defendant:
ABX Air, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Withdrow v. CSX Transportation Inc
as 1:2007cv00418
Plaintiff:
K Dean Withdrow
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Fusi v. Emery Worldwide Airlines Inc et al
as 3:2007cv00039
Plaintiff:
Randal Fusi, Timothy Vest, Craig Sandman and others
Defendant:
Emery Worldwide Airlines Inc, Emery Worldwide Airlines Inc, Emery Worldwide Airlines Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Air Line Pilots Association, International v. DHL Holdings (USA), Inc.
as 1:2006cv00823
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
ASTAR Air Cargo Inc v. Air Line Pilots Association International
as 1:2006cv00785
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, Division 79 et al
as 2:2006cv00823
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant:
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, Division 79, Edward L. Bright, United Transportation Union, Local 1376 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Boenau v. PSA Airlines, Inc. et al
as 3:2006cv00172
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 1108 v. NetJets Aviation, Inc.
as 2:2005cv01063
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
NetJets Aviation, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airline Division et al
as 2:2005cv01049
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
