Ohio Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 4,980
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 4:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC and Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC and Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
john doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Spectrum Laboratories, LLC v. Quick Fix Plus et al
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Spectrum Laboratories, LLC
Defendant:
Quick Fix Plus and Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Altronic LLC v. MotorTech GmbH, et al.
as 4:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Altronic LLC
Defendant:
MotorTech GmbH, Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. v. Mark Feldstein & Associates, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark Feldstein & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Noco Company v. Lapidus
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Isaac Lapidus and Isaac Lapidus doing business as Profit Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Taza Systems, LLC v. Alkhatib et al.
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Taza Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Taza Mediterranean Cuisine, Inc., Saif Alkhatib, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
