Ohio Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 58,686
Moseley v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02141
Plaintiff:
Amanda Moseley
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smoot v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02151
Plaintiff:
Thelma Smoot
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Strausbaugh v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02152
Plaintiff:
Richard Strausbaugh
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02125
Plaintiff:
Rosemary James
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02126
Plaintiff:
Edward Jones
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02137
Plaintiff:
Andrea Moore
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Strawder v. Mathys
as 3:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
Caitlin Strawder
Defendant:
Linda L. Mathys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brown v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65406
Plaintiff:
Takese S. Brown
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Price v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65400
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Price
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Deakins v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65407
Plaintiff:
Amaya Deakins
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
