Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 17,751
Eckstein v. Lloyd et al.
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Andrew Eckstein
Defendant:
Inspector Diane Lloyd, Warden Jennifer Black and Lutinent D. Thrasher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodykoontz v. State Of Ohio
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
David Goodyhoontz
Defendant:
State Of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lauck v. Black
as 3:2024cv00534
Petitioner:
Ronald Dean Lauck
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. USA
as 1:2024cv00513
Petitioner:
Deandre Allen
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sudberry v. Stuff et al.
as 3:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
James D. Rome Sudberry
Defendant:
Warden Stuff, Booth, Roberson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 1:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Darryl Smith
Defendant:
Anette Chambers-Smith, Timothy McConahay, James Kennard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monachino v. Village of Walton Hills Police Dept et al.
as 1:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Nicholas A. Monachino
Defendant:
Village of Walton Hills Police Dept, Calvin J. Schmidt and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Dadisman et al.
as 5:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Clark
Defendant:
Detective Shaun Dadisman, Detective Gohlike, Officer Slack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. USA
as 2:2024cv01280
Petitioner:
Larry Dean Porter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Solly v. Hoying et al
as 2:2024cv01249
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Solly
Defendant:
Lisa Hoying, Annette Chambers-Smith, Glenn Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
