US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 2,582
Doe #60 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
John Doe #60
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stacy v. Clarksville Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Dylan Stacy
Defendant:
Clarksville Police Department, City of Clarksville and Jamal Alquzweeni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taliaferro v. HCA et al
as 3:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Linda Taliaferro
Defendant:
HCA and HCA Centennial Head and Neck Surgery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
New Muslim Party v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
New Muslim Party
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burgess v. City of Pulaski/City of Pulaski Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Wayne Burgess
Defendant:
City of Pulaski/City of Pulaski Police Department, Officer Joel Robison, Officer John Dickey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welch v. United Network for Organ Sharing et al
as 3:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Dexter Welch
Defendant:
United Network for Organ Sharing and Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Nakomis Jones
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ewin v. The Kroger Co.
as 3:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Tywaska Ewin
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Graham III v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Frank Graham III
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Burrell
as 3:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edwards
Defendant:
Mallory Burrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
