US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Civil Rights Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 6,561
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act
Vargo v. Graves et al
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Derrick Vargo
Defendant:
Matthew Graves and Christopher Wray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. ABC Nurses et al
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Willard William Wright
Defendant:
Dickson Count Jail Official AB and C, Head Nurse Kim (l/n/u), Pamela A. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe #029 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
John Doe #029
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
George v. Star Garrison Station, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Defendant:
Star Garrison Station, LLC, Star Victory Station, LLC, Steadfast Apartment Advisor, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Cynthia George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act
Lyons v. Corwin et al
as 3:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Jevonte Lyons
Defendant:
Nathan Corwin, Makayla Tharpe, Kyle Ferree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
John Doe and John Doe #108
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
