US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Labor Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 1,010
Clark v. Gallimore Restoration, LLC, d/b/a Servpro of LBL South and Servpro of LBL North
as 1:2023cv01162
Plaintiff:
Theodore Clark
Defendant:
Gallimore Restoration, LLC, d/b/a Servpro of LBL South and Servpro of LBL North
Garcia et al v. Jac-Co Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02485
Plaintiff:
Francisco Garcia and Manuel Rosales Aguilar
Defendant:
Jac-Co Construction, Inc., Leland Jackson and Deborah Lynn Jackson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Brooks et al v. Road Master, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02478
Plaintiff:
Gregory Brooks, Henry Jackson and William Anderson
Defendant:
Road Master, Inc., Davenport Towing and Recovery, LLC. and Douglas O Williams
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Boxley v. Furniture World Discount Warehouse
as 2:2023cv02476
Plaintiff:
Issac Boxley
Defendant:
Furniture World Discount Warehouse, Inc.
Hoffman v. Huddle House, Inc.,
as 1:2023cv01160
Plaintiff:
Amanda Hoffman
Defendant:
Huddle House, Inc.,
Hicks v. Memphis Wings Operations, LLC, et al
as 2:2023cv02477
Plaintiff:
Demetrious Hicks
Defendant:
Memphis Wings Operations, LLC doing business as Wing Stop and Troy Morrison
Woods v. Millennium Search, LLC
as 2:2023cv02455
Plaintiff:
Robin Woods
Defendant:
Millennium Search, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Merritt v. WIPRO LIMITED
as 2:2023cv02453
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Merritt
Defendant:
WIPRO LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Merritt v. WIPRO LIMITE3D
as 2:2023cv02452
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Merritt
Defendant:
WIPRO LIMITE3D
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Midence v. MJ Framing & Drywall, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02425
Plaintiff:
Marlon Andres Castillo Midence
Defendant:
MJ Framing & Drywall, LLC, Miguel Ortiz, Jose Ortiz and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
