Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 4,787
Shields v. Obion County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2024cv01082
Petitioner:
Carale Shields
Respondent:
Obion County, Tennessee and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00159
Petitioner:
Nathaniel S Robinson
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blakeley v. Shelby County Correctional Center
as 2:2024cv02215
Petitioner:
Michael David Blakeley
Respondent:
Shelby County Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ford v. Pound
as 3:2024cv00151
Petitioner:
Micah Joshua Ford and Joseph I Tolbert
Respondent:
Zach Pound
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duncan v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00167
Petitioner:
James D Duncan
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2024cv01070
Petitioner:
Jeremy Sims
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Enix v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
Tyler Ward Enix
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Watwood
as 1:2024cv01068
Petitioner:
Antonio Nelson
Respondent:
Brandon Watwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reyes v. Warden, FCI Memphis
as 2:2024cv02192
Petitioner:
Guadalupe Reyes
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Memphis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramirez-Ortega v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02185
Petitioner:
Hernan Ramirez-Ortega
Respondent:
Warden Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
