Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 25,031
Erby v. Bonner
as 2:2024cv02699
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tut v. Watwood, Warden
as 3:2024cv01152
Petitioner:
Tut Mayal Tut
Respondent:
Brandon Watwood, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Greene v. State of Tennessee, The
as 3:2024cv01153
Plaintiff:
Corey Devell Greene
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lester v. Giles County et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Defendant:
Kyle Helton, Giles County and Morgan Beckman
Plaintiff:
Jackie Phillip Lester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pianga v. Head Public Defender for Davidson Co. Nash., TN et al
as 3:2024cv01146
Defendant:
Public Defenders, Beth l/n/u and Head Public Defender for Davidson Co. Nash., TN
Plaintiff:
James C. Pianga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pianga v. Barrea et al
as 3:2024cv01147
Defendant:
Jennifer Barrea and Public Defender Office
Plaintiff:
James C. Pianga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. USA
as 4:2024cv00069
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ashley Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cole v. Carter
as 2:2024cv02693
Petitioner:
Eric Cole
Respondent:
Warden T. Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Shelby County Justice Center et al
as 2:2024cv02687
Defendant:
Sgt Buford and Shelby County Justice Center
Plaintiff:
Derrico Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Walker et al
as 2:2024cv02688
Defendant:
Anthony Alexander, Reece Walker and Sherry McGee
Plaintiff:
Steven Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
