U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Froedtert South, Inc. v. Christopher Stone
as 25-1439
Petitioner:
FROEDTERT SOUTH, INC.
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER STONE
Vivek Bedi, et al v. Premium Healthcare Solutions LLC
as 25-1419
Plaintiff:
MEDLEGAL SOLUTIONS, INC., doing business as Atticus Medical Billing
Appellant:
VIVEK BEDI
Defendant:
PREMIUM HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS LLC
Froedtert South, Inc. v. Christopher Stone
as 25-1383
Petitioner:
FROEDTERT SOUTH, INC.
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER STONE
UpHealth Holdings, Inc. v. Meleveetil Damodaran
as 24-3016
Respondent:
MELEVEETIL DAMODARAN
Petitioner:
UPHEALTH HOLDINGS, INC.
UpHealth Holdings, Inc. v. Glocal Healthcare Systems Private Limited, et al
as 24-2915
Respondent:
RICHA SANA AZIM, GAUTAM CHOWDHURY, MELEVEETIL DAMODARAN and others
Petitioner:
UPHEALTH HOLDINGS, INC.
UpHealth Holdings, Inc. v. Glocal Healthcare Systems Private Limited, et al
as 24-2900
Petitioner:
UPHEALTH HOLDINGS, INC.
Respondent:
RICHA SANA AZIM, SYED SABAHAT AZIM, Doctor, GLOCAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED and others
Ana Bernal, et al v. Kohl's Corporation, et al
as 24-2806
Plaintiff:
CLARA ROA, AIMEE MARQUEZ, PATRICIA JUAREZ and others
Defendant:
KOHL'S, INC. and KOHL'S CORPORATION
Quality Custom Distribution v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 710
as 24-1648
Petitioner:
QUALITY CUSTOM DISTRIBUTION
Respondent:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL 710
Melanie Hoeg, et al v. Samsung Electronics America, Incorporated
as 24-1274
Plaintiff:
MELANIE HOEG, MELINDA GARCIA, 1025 OTHER INDIVIDUALS and others
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INCORPORATED
David King v. Universal Health Services of Hartgrove, Incorporat, et al
as 23-3154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID KING
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES OF HARTGROVE, INCORPORATED and UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
