U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Mattie Lomax v. City of Chicago, et al
as 24-1013
Plaintiff:
MATTIE T. LOMAX
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO and LANDON HOWARD
Brian Elkins, et al v. Southeastern Indiana Health Management Inc.
as 23-3159
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BRIAN ELKINS, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated and ANNIE ELKINS, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
SOUTHEASTERN INDIANA HEALTH MANAGEMENT INC., doing business as COLUMBUS REGIONAL HEALTH
Jessica Gehner v. Cook Medical, LLC, et al
as 23-3008
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSICA GEHNER
Defendant / Appellee:
COOK MEDICAL, LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Economic Loss Plaintiffs v. Abbott Laboratories
as 23-2525
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ECONOMIC LOSS PLAINTIFFS
Defendant / Appellee:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES
Economic Loss Plaintiffs v. Abbott Laboratories
as 23-2233
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ECONOMIC LOSS PLAINTIFFS
Defendant / Appellee:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES
Brad Martin v. Actavis Inc., et al
as 22-2675
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRAD MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
ACTAVIS INC., ACTAVIS PHARMA INC. and ACTAVIS LABORATORIES UT, INC.
Brad Martin v. Actavis Inc., et al
as 22-2664
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRAD MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
ACTAVIS INC., ACTAVIS PHARMA INC. and ACTAVIS LABORATORIES UT, INC.
Mattie Lomax v. City of Chicago, et al
as 22-2139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTIE T. LOMAX
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, a Municipal Corp. and LANDON HOWARD, Claims Specialist
Mattie Lomax v. City of Chicago, et al
as 22-1884
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTIE T. LOMAX
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO and LANDON HOWARD
Teresa Sykes v. Cook Incorporated, et al
as 22-1844
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERESA F. SYKES
Defendant / Appellee:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL, LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
