Seventh Circuit Contract Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 422
Lieble v. Hill-Rom Holdings Inc et al
as 1:2021cv05681
Plaintiff:
Chris Lieble
Defendant:
Hill-Rom Holdings Inc, John P Groetelaars, William G. Dempsey and others
Pneu-Con Holdings, Inc. v. Gillespie
as 1:2021cv05201
Plaintiff:
Pneu-Con Holdings, INC and Pneu-Con Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Warren Gillespie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Allen v. Parker et al
as 1:2021cv04722
Plaintiff:
Arlene Allen
Defendant:
Andrew Parker, Harriet Parker and HubTack, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Oshinski v. Coordinated Consulting Systems, Inc.
as 1:2021cv04416
Plaintiff:
Joseph Oshinski
Defendant:
Coordinated Consulting Systems, Inc., Julie Mizzi and Coordinated Systems Consulting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shah v. Arote et al
as 1:2021cv03699
Plaintiff:
Rahul Shah
Defendant:
Pravin Arote, Milind Karandikar, Yogesh Agarwal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Exelon Corporation Derivative Litigation
as 1:2021cv03611
Plaintiff:
James Clem, Benjamin Jason Wax, Michael Dybas and others
Defendant:
Exelon Corporation, Christopher M. Crane, Joseph Dominguez and others
Petitioner:
Donna M. Nicosia, City of Coral Springs Police Officers' Pension Plan and John Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Miller v. Hastert et al
as 1:2021cv02143
Defendant:
Dale Hastert and U R, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Erik Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herrera v. Boroditsky et al
as 1:2021cv01789
Defendant:
Marc Zenner, Jean K. Holley, OneSpan, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Herrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. EBX ENTERPRISES, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00353
Plaintiff:
DAVID A WILLIAMS, JR. and DAVID A. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
ELIJAH W. BLAND and EBX ENTERPRISES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roe v. Nano Gas Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2020cv07269
Defendant:
Nano Gas Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cliffton Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
