Seventh Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 8,126
Escobar v. Tank Noodle, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03359
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Garcia Escobar
Defendant:
Tank Noodle, Inc., Thien Hoang Ly and Thuc Minu Huynh
Pierro v. The Carle Foundation Hospital
as 2:2023cv02117
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Pierro
Defendant:
The Carle Foundation Hospital
Martinez Sr. v. Save Wholesale, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03323
Plaintiff:
Luis Martinez Sr.
Defendant:
Save Wholesale, Inc. and Mahmud Uthman
Carter v. Brackenbox, Inc., et al
as 1:2023cv03329
Plaintiff:
Brian - Carter
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Su v. Bistro Wasabi, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2023cv03320
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su, Acting Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor,
Defendant:
Bistro Wasabi, L.L.C., d/b/a El Cochino, an Illinois limited liability company,, Bistro Wasabi II, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company,, Maria Kim, an individual, and and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Armstead v. Valley View School District
as 1:2023cv03312
Plaintiff:
Theresa Armstead
Defendant:
Valley View School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Julie A. Su v. Hall Drive-Ins, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su, Acting Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor,
Defendant:
Hall Drive-Ins, Inc. d/b/a Factory Restaurant, an Indiana Corporation, and and Luke Hall, an individual,
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Toro Caro v. Maradiaga
as 1:2023cv03266
Plaintiff:
Edinson Toro Caro
Defendant:
Norman Odaldo Maradiaga doing business as Maradiaga's Construction Services
Diaz v. Mays
as 1:2023cv03240
Plaintiff:
Raul Diaz
Defendant:
Buitoni Mays doing business as Northshore Property Management
Rodriguez v. Smoked Meats Co. et al
as 1:2023cv03235
Plaintiff:
Cesar Palmerin Rodriguez
Defendant:
Smoked Meats Co. and Christopher J. Kawa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
