Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 830
Mackel v. Department of Human Services et al
as 4:2023cv04103
Plaintiff:
David Mackel
Defendant:
Department of Human Services, Greg Donathan, Erin Posey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. McElrath
as 4:2023cv04096
Plaintiff:
Anthony Martin
Defendant:
Brenda McElrath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schloss v. Beckett et al
as 4:2023cv04090
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Schloss
Defendant:
William Beckett, Kelly Harvey, Abdi Tinwalla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Werfel
as 4:2023cv04080
Plaintiff:
Clerence Johnson
Defendant:
Danny Werfel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Salvage et al
as 4:2023cv04077
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
Lannissa Salvage and Greg Donathan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyjak v. Daniels et al
as 3:2023cv03170
Plaintiff:
Logan Dyjak
Defendant:
Harvey Daniels, Jo-an Lynn, Stacey Horstman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacKintosh v. Hogan et al
as 4:2023cv04060
Plaintiff:
Curtis J MacKintosh
Defendant:
Heather Hogan, . Shah and . Mary-Beth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Jumper et al
as 4:2023cv04059
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sullivan
Defendant:
Shan Jumper, Gerald Carreon, Sandra Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Speagle v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 4:2023cv04052
Plaintiff:
Billy A Speagle
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Vipin Shah, Mary Patricia Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Hymes et al
as 4:2023cv04051
Plaintiff:
Chadd Morris
Defendant:
Heather Hymes, . Calon, Paula Lodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
