Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 831
Winston v. Hefly et al
as 4:2022cv04189
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
Y Hefly, S Jumper, G Carreon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls v. State of Illinois et al
as 4:2022cv04178
Plaintiff:
William Walls
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Cook County State's Attorneys Office, Illinois Attorney General Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Rushville TDF Administration
as 4:2022cv04177
Plaintiff:
Maceo G Willis, Jr
Defendant:
Rushville TDF Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Weir et al
as 4:2022cv04169
Plaintiff:
Keith Hill
Defendant:
. Weir, . Baptiste, Mara Sheldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swanson v. Scott et al
as 4:2022cv04163
Plaintiff:
John Swanson
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Greg Donathan, Eric Kunkel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arrington v. Epperson et al
as 4:2022cv04161
Plaintiff:
Otis Arrington
Defendant:
William Epperson, P. Lodge, A Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers v. Cobb et al
as 4:2022cv04160
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
A Cobb, Paula Lodge and John and/or Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashford v. Donathan
as 4:2022cv04153
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ashford
Defendant:
Gregg Donathan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Hendrix et al
as 4:2022cv04151
Plaintiff:
Mario Diaz
Defendant:
M Hendrix and Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Jumper et al
as 4:2022cv04146
Plaintiff:
Keith Hill
Defendant:
Shan Jumper, A Cobb and A Hoyt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
