Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 44,581
Stalker v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Daniel Stalker
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Chad Jennings and Phil Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Attaway v. David et al
as 3:2024cv01117
Plaintiff:
Micheal Attaway
Defendant:
Alfonso David, Alexandria Brown and Ashley Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04066
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sullivan
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Erin Posey, Sandra Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashford v. Jumper et al
as 4:2024cv04067
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ashford
Defendant:
Shawn Jumper and Jane/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dahl v. USA
as 3:2024cv03090
Petitioner:
Adam Dahl
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Floyd v. Ackman et al
as 4:2024cv04068
Plaintiff:
Sebron Floyd
Defendant:
J Ackman, . Watercotte, Greg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lake v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2024cv50144
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Illinois Attorney General and McHenry County Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Prisoner Review Board et al
as 1:2024cv03027
Plaintiff:
James KA Thomas
Defendant:
Prisoner Review Board, Jared Bohland, Kenneth Tupy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley v. Jennings et al
as 3:2024cv50150
Plaintiff:
Durwyn Talley
Defendant:
Joseph Jennings, Lt. McBride, Andrea Tack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2024cv01112
Petitioner:
Keith Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
