US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Other Statutes Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 72
Everbank v. Martinez et al
as 4:2008cv00044
Plaintiff:
Everbank, Everbank, Everbank and others
Defendant:
Steven J Martinez, Argent Healthcare Financial Services, John Doe and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Amanda Martinez, Steven Martinez, Jr, Mia Martinez and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Tracy R Vanderwall, Vanderwall Development LLC, Risner Realty & Associates Inc and others
Counter Claimant:
Amanda Martinez, Steven Martinez, Jr, Mia Martinez and others
Counter Defendant:
Tracy R Vanderwall, Vanderwall Development LLC, Risner Realty & Associates Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Njuguna v. Sheneman et al
as 3:2007cv00225
Plaintiff:
Juster M Njuguna
Defendant:
Jeremie Sheneman and JTS Properties Inc LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Belk v. Millers Mutual Group of Insurance Cos et al
as 3:2007cv00203
Plaintiff:
Joshua Belk
Defendant:
Millers Mutual Group of Insurance Cos, Equity Mutual Insurance Company, George C Rogge Agency Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rosenbaum et al v. Seybold et al
as 1:2006cv00352
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Oak Street Mortgage LLC v. Fundz R Us Inc et al
as 3:2006cv00491
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
De Paoli v. Broadway Methodist Hospital et al
as 3:2006cv00288
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Eagle Capital Inc v. Preferred Image Inc et al
as 1:2005cv00070
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tectan LLC et al v. Tanfran Inc et al
as 1:2004cv00339
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Castady Jr et al v. National Check Bureau Inc et al
as 2:2004cv00132
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
