US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 3,816
Hammond City of et al v. ASARCO Master Inc
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
City of Hammond, Indiana and City of Whiting, Indiana
Defendant:
ASARCO MASTER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6972 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Simbeck v. Sheriff
as 3:2024cv00171
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
NYLife Securities LLC et al v. Myers
as 1:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
NYLife Securities LLC and NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
James Myers
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
IMO The Supervised Administration of the Estate of Robert L Anderson Deceased
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Defendant:
In Re: the Estate of Robert L. Anderson, Deceased Personal Representative Mulvaney, Loa J., United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Carmen Anderson and others
Other:
IMO Supervised Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
