US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Social Security Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 2,168
WILSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00923
Plaintiff:
AARON P. WILSON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WATKINS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00842
Plaintiff:
ANDRE WATKINS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
MCCOLLOM v. KIJAKAZI
as 3:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
JAMES T MCCOLLOM
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GRIZZLE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00835
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA M. GRIZZLE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
HUTCHISON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00841
Plaintiff:
NIOAKA S HUTCHISON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0423 Social Security Act (Disability Insurance Benefit Payments)
HOWARD v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00803
Plaintiff:
BILLIE J. HOWARD
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BURRIS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00788
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY BURRIS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WILLIAMS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00764
Plaintiff:
ARLON WILLIAMS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
JEFFERSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00756
Plaintiff:
NICOLE JEFFERSON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HARDEN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00751
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE A. HARDEN
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
