Southern District of Indiana Social Security Cases

Supplemental Security Income Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 1,169
JONES v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv00091
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff: JOANN C. JONES
Cause Of Action: Social Security Benefits
LIVINGSTON v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00512
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff: SHEENA LIVINGSTON
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SCOTT v. COLVIN
as 1:2017cv00520
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff: STEPHANIE D. SCOTT
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only), USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
FAIRFIELD v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00519
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff: KAYLON P. FAIRFIELD
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only), USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Review of Agency Action-HHS
RACZAK v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv00084
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff: DANIEL J. RACZAK
Cause Of Action: Social Security Benefits
FARR v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00442
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff: HOLLIE M. FARR
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only), USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
PHILBECK v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00423
Defendant: NANCY A BERRYHILL
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS O. PHILBECK
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only), USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SEXTON v. COLVIN
as 1:2017cv00398
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff: PATRICIA SEXTON
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only), USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MARTIN v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00366
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff: MICHAEL MARTIN
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
PIERCE v. ACTING COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2017cv00317
Defendant: ACTING COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff: LAUREL G. PIERCE
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only), USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?