US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Cases 31 - 40 of 15,832
Blaha, Billy Jo v. Sauk County et al
as 3:2024cv00834
Defendant:
Sauk County and Blake Zibell
Plaintiff:
Billy Jo Blaha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Patent Armory Inc. v. Avid Ratings, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
Avid Ratings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Patent Armory Inc. v. Northwestern Mutual LLC
as 3:2024cv00836
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
United States of America v. Riezinger-Von Reitz, Anna et al
as 3:2024cv00831
Defendant:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Anna M. Belcher, James C. Belcher and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
NTM, Inc. v. A.A. Arena Products, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
NTM, Inc.
Defendant:
A.A. Arena Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Salgado-Sosa, Israel v. Emmerich, E.
as 3:2024cv00827
Respondent:
Warden E. Emmerich
Petitioner:
Israel Salgado-Sosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Knutson, Jeremy v. Lenzner, George
as 3:2024cv00826
Petitioner:
Jeremy Knutson
Respondent:
George Lenzner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker, Todd v. Warden E. Emmerich
as 3:2024cv00829
Petitioner:
Todd R. Walker
Respondent:
Warden E. Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Goodvine v. Sukowaty et al
as 3:2024cv00828
Defendant:
Dr. Daniel La Voie and Laura Sukowaty
Unknown:
WCI Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Christopher Goodvine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
