Eighth Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 15,884
La Botte v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03315
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Johney R. La Botte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Butler v. Social Security Administration
as 8:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Allen Butler
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Blamble v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv00445
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Keesha Blamble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Marcum v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00974
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Pamela Renee Marcum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
McGinnis v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2024cv05235
Plaintiff:
Charles McGinnis
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Frisby v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00212
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Curtis Frisby, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ward v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05085
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Don Erick Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dixon v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Andrew E Dixon
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
O'Brien v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Meg Acushla O'Brien
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Beasley v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
George Beasley
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
