US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 3,012
Erby v. Van Loo
as 4:2023cv01283
Petitioner:
DaJuan M Erby
Respondent:
Brock Van Loo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McEuen v. Morriss
as 4:2023cv01270
Petitioner:
Jeffrey McEuen
Respondent:
Kelly Morriss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Stange
as 1:2023cv00178
Petitioner:
Frederick Brown
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chilton v. Missouri Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv00180
Petitioner:
Brett Michaels Chilton
Respondent:
Missouri Department of Corrections and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Montes v. Strid
as 2:2023cv00055
Petitioner:
Hector G. Montes
Respondent:
Myles Strid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fuget v. USA
as 4:2023cv01241
Petitioner:
Justin Fuget
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hernandez v. Adams
as 4:2023cv01236
Petitioner:
Rey Juan Hernandez
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez-Diaz v. State of Missouri
as 1:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Marco Sanchez-Diaz
Defendant:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Montes v. Strid
as 2:2023cv00054
Petitioner:
Hector G. Montes
Respondent:
Myles Strid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCormick v. Missouri, State of
as 1:2023cv00168
Petitioner:
John D. McCormick
Respondent:
Missouri, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
