South Dakota Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 447
Wadsworth v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv04160
Plaintiff:
Tim Bishop Wadsworth
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bock v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv05066
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Bridget A. Bock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ventura v. O'Malley et al
as 4:2024cv04141
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Ventura
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lang v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv04137
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Toby L. Lang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pelton v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv05044
Plaintiff:
Lisa Anderson Pelton
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Ward v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv04111
Plaintiff:
Ashley Ward
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ward v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2024cv05045
Plaintiff:
Ashley Ward
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jones v. O'Malley et al
as 4:2024cv04102
Plaintiff:
Nayda Jones
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tueffel v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv04033
Plaintiff:
Tiffany A. Tueffel
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Misner v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01019
Plaintiff:
Tamra Jean Misner
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
