US District Court for the Southern District of California
Cases 91 - 100 of 56,093
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00884
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679 Violation of Credit Repair Organizations Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Colson Health, Inc. v. WBRPA Moms LLC
as 3:2024cv00892
Plaintiff:
Colson Health, Inc.
Defendant:
WBRPA Moms LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 la Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Tradesmen International LLC v. Tradesman4DNC LLC
as 3:2024cv00894
Plaintiff:
Tradesmen International LLC
Defendant:
Tradesman4DNC LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Hardy v. Silva et al
as 3:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
Kristin Hardy
Defendant:
A. Silva and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Disability Definition
Alexander v. Kao et al
as 3:2024cv00883
Defendant:
Johnthan Kao, Johnthan Kap and Jesse Guevara
Plaintiff:
Liam Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 in Personal Injury
Eyong v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company et al
as 3:2024cv00877
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Eyong
Defendant:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company, Nassco Holdings Incorporated and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity-Notice of Removal
Habbaba v. Gorilla Mind, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00875
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Habbaba
Defendant:
Gorilla Mind, LLC and Does 1-500
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
