Ninth Circuit Contract Cases

Marine Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 1,917
Cross Link, Inc. v. Salt River Construction Corporation
as 3:2016cv05412
Petitioner: Cross Link, Inc. dba Westar Marine Services
Respondent: Salt River Construction Corporation
Cause Of Action: Admiralty
Foodlinx Inc. v. The China Navigation Company PTE Ltd
as 3:2016cv05390
Plaintiff: Foodlinx Inc.
Defendant: The China Navigation Company PTE Ltd
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2016cv01463
Plaintiff: Alaskan Anvil LLC
Defendant: Patrick Davis, Jane Doe Davis
Cause Of Action: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Marine
Alaskan Anvil, LLC v. Davis et al
as 3:2016cv05796
Plaintiff: Alaskan Anvil LLC
Defendant: Patrick Davis, Jane Doe Davis
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Marine
APL Co. Pte Ltd. et al v. Extreme Linen, LLC
as 2:2016cv06885
Plaintiff: APL Co. Pte Ltd., American President Lines Ltd.
Defendant: Extreme Linen, LLC
APL Co. Pte Ltd. v. ATI International Corporation
as 2:2016cv06792
Plaintiff: APL Co. Pte Ltd.
Defendant: ATI International Corporation
Holmes et al v. Yct. Nova et al
as 2:2016cv01422
Plaintiff: Robert Holmes , Marquis International Holdings, LLC
Defendant: Yct. Nova, Yct. M Squared, Stephen Yadvish and others
Cause Of Action: Admiralty
Delta Marine Industries, Inc. v. F/V SILVER ISLE et al
as 2:2016cv01411
Plaintiff: Delta Marine Industries, Inc.
Defendant: F/V SILVER ISLE, Raymond Forsman, Norma Forsman
Cause Of Action: Admiralty
Bank of the Pacific v. F/V Susan Rae et al
as 3:2016cv05761
Plaintiff: Bank of the Pacific
Defendant: F/V Susan Rae, William D. Taylor
Cause Of Action: Admiralty
APM Terminals Pacific LLC v. Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd.
as 2:2016cv06657
Interested Party: AP MOLLER - MAERSK A/S
Plaintiff: APM Terminals Pacific LLC
Defendant: Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?