Ninth Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 3,712
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Nunez et al
as 3:2022cv07136
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Fernando Vasquez Nunez, Humberto Vasquez and Emelina's Peruvian Restaurant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Communications Act of 1994
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Aidas Mattis et al
as 2:2022cv08090
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Aidas Joseph Mattis, Edita Lipas Mattis, Douglas Martin Milton and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Villegas et al
as 2:2022cv01892
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events LLC and G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Defendant:
Israel Higuera Villegas individually doing business as Inches Tacos, Veronica Valenzuela individually doing business as Inches Tacos and Tacos y Mariscos Topolobampo LLC an unknown business entity doing business as Inches Tacos
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Barksdale et al
as 2:2022cv02002
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Tommy Barksdale individually Doing business as Port City Sports Bar and Grill, Everett Hunter individually Doing business as Port City Sports Bar and Grill and Port City Sports Bar and Grill, LLC Doing business as Port City Sports Bar and Grill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Carla Pamela Pastor et al
as 2:2022cv07991
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Carla Pamela Pastor individually doing business as Casa Ruiz Peruvian Restaurant and Casa Ruiz Peruvian Restaurant, LLC an unknown business entity doing business as Casa Ruiz Peruvian Restaurant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Malkit Sogy et al
as 2:2022cv08003
Plaintiff:
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Malkit Sogy individually doing business as Bollywood Bar, Grill and Pizza, Sogy and Sons, Inc. doing business as Bollywood Bar, Grill and Pizza and Sogy and Sons, Inc. an unknown business entity doing business as Bollywood Bar, Grill and Pizza
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Wilmar E. Coreas
as 2:2022cv08013
Plaintiff:
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Wilmar E. Coreas individually doing business as Spruce Barber Lounge
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Snyder et al
as 3:2022cv01702
Defendant:
Elite Venues L.L.C. an unknown business entity doing business as Salt Drift Pointe formerly known as Beast Mode Events L.L.C., Terrence R. Snyder individually and doing business as Salt Drift Pointe, Richard M. Inzunza individually and doing business as Salt Drift Pointe and others
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Sergio Franco et al
as 2:2022cv07920
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC and G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Sergio Franco, Jesus Franco, Klownski Foundation Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Santiago
as 2:2022cv07850
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC and G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Maria Delaluz Santiago individually and d/b/a Marisqueria El Tejado and Maria Delaluz Santiago individually doing business as Marisqueria El Tejado
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
