US District Court for the Eastern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 17,445
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv00980
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Christensen v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00979
Petitioner:
Chad Andre Christensen
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Harris v. Pfeifer et al
as 1:2024cv00361
Petitioner:
Ernest Harris
Respondent:
C. Pfeifer, M. Melendrez and Cortez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Curry v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00956
Petitioner:
David Henry Curry
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Torrez v. Lundy
as 1:2024cv00362
Petitioner:
Julio Angel Torrez, Jr.
Respondent:
L. Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Ramos v. Tyler
as 2:2024cv00946
Petitioner:
Salvador Ramos
Respondent:
Thomas Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) KasenzangaKhona v. Cano et al
as 1:2024cv00358
Petitioner:
Shakazulu Sigidi KasenzangaKhona
Respondent:
L. Cano, Lozano, De La Torree and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Barefield v. Covello
as 2:2024cv00945
Petitioner:
Michael S. Barefield, Sr.
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC) Solomon v. CDCR
as 2:2024cv00924
Petitioner:
Lakquan D. Solomon
Respondent:
CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Gibson v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00893
Petitioner:
Brittany Renee Gibson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
