US District Court for the Eastern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 17,440
(HC) Larios v. Alomari
as 1:2024cv00302
Petitioner:
Roque Larios, Jr.
Respondent:
Ismael Alomari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Montgomery-Gutzman v. Covelo
as 2:2024cv00739
Petitioner:
Taylor William Montgomery-Gutzman
Respondent:
Patrick Covelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Brown v. Andes
as 2:2024cv00742
Petitioner:
Shawn C. Brown
Respondent:
Chance Andes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Phan v. Covello
as 2:2024cv00735
Petitioner:
Minh Kha Hoang Phan
Respondent:
P. Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Davis v. People of San Joaquin
as 2:2024cv00734
Petitioner:
Willis Davis
Respondent:
People of San Joaquin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) White v. Department of State Hospitals et al
as 1:2024cv00291
Petitioner:
Rodney White
Respondent:
Department of State Hospitals, Stephanie Clendenin and Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Nunn v. Keenan
as 2:2024cv00676
Petitioner:
Joseph Arthur Nunn
Respondent:
Stefanie Keenan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) McKiney v. Newson
as 2:2024cv00680
Petitioner:
Alonzo McKiney, Alonzo McKinney and Alonso McKiney
Respondent:
Newson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv00681
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Smith v. County of Riverside
as 2:2024cv00688
Petitioner:
Derek Smith
Respondent:
County of Riverside
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
