US District Court for the Eastern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 25,034
(PC) Thomas v. Gomez et al
as 1:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas
Defendant:
Gomez and Lindquist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Abdullah v. Casaurang et al
as 2:2024cv01223
Plaintiff:
Jalaal Abdullah
Defendant:
A. Casaurang, Warden, Associate Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Thomas v. Castro et al
as 1:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas
Defendant:
J. Castro and Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Soto v. Sacramento Main Jail et al
as 2:2024cv01222
Plaintiff:
William Soto
Defendant:
Sacramento Main Jail and Sacramento RCCC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Collins v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01229
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Collins
Defendant:
D. Smith and David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) DePonte v. Bowman, et al.
as 2:2024cv01262
Plaintiff:
David Arthur DePonte
Defendant:
Jessica Bowman and Daniel Queava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv01208
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Wilson v. Molina et al
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Combs Wilson
Defendant:
C. Molina, J. Banania, B. Madrigal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) McDowell v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Giovanni McDowell
Defendant:
Steve Smith, Jeffrey Storey, Joseph Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Reyes-Villanueva v. Pouge, et al.
as 1:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Michael Reyes-Villanueva
Defendant:
Tyson Poug, Gustavian, Debbie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
