US District Court for the Northern District of California Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 22,739
Austin v. Kia America, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
George Jarvis Austin
Defendant:
Kia America, Inc., Epiq Global, Susan Illston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Barukzai v. City and County of San Francisco
as 3:2024cv02274
Plaintiff:
Masoud Barukzai
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Patterson v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District et al
as 4:2024cv02190
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Patterson
Defendant:
FNU Matsui, FNU Alexander and San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Arakji v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 5:2024cv02202
Plaintiff:
Mazen Arakji
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Amazon, Apple Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
L. v. County of Trinity et al
as 3:2024cv02211
Plaintiff:
S. L.
Defendant:
County of Trinity, Tim Saxon, Ron Whitman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
