US District Court for the Northern District of California Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,370
Hosseinyoun v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 3:2024cv02809
Plaintiff:
Tanya Hosseinyoun
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Jill Scott and Brett Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Parker v. Conduent HR Services, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02821
Plaintiff:
Philip Parker
Defendant:
Conduent HR Services, LLC and Conduent Business Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Abid-Castelo v. ITW Food Equipment Group LLC
as 4:2024cv02813
Plaintiff:
Ali Abid-Castelo
Defendant:
ITW Food Equipment Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
v. Hero Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2024mc80107
Defendant:
Hero Labs, Inc. and Vishal Shah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Sun v. Wu et al
as 3:2024cv02747
Plaintiff:
Zhi Sun
Defendant:
Yiqi Wu and Aimerce Inc
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Shugars et al v. Walmart Inc.
as 5:2024cv02765
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. doing business as Spark Driver formerly known as Delivery Drivers, Inc., and Delivery Drivers, Inc.,
Plaintiff:
Crystal Shugars and Niccole Le'Roy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
O'Reilly v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02664
Plaintiff:
Conor Patrick O'Reilly
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Edmondson v. GardaWorld Cashlink, LLC
as 4:2024cv02675
Plaintiff:
Donald Edmondson
Defendant:
GardaWorld Cashlink, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Wilburg v. iVueit, LLC
as 3:2024cv02642
Plaintiff:
Alice Wilburg
Defendant:
iVueit, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Johnson et al v. GIGSMART, INC.
as 3:2024cv02521
Plaintiff:
Susan Johnson and Christi McCracken
Defendant:
GIGSMART, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
