US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 81 - 90 of 153,777
Cherkin et al v. PowerSchool Holdings, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02706
Plaintiff:
Emily Cherkin and David Concepcion
Defendant:
PowerSchool Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE 2ND CIVIL COURT OF INTELLECTUAL AND INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN ANKARA, TURKEY
as 3:2024mc80102
Petitioner:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Google LLC
Zhang v. Didrew Technology Limited
as 3:2024cv02686
Plaintiff:
Chunbin Zhang
Defendant:
Didrew Technology Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Miner v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv02685
Plaintiff:
Gara Miner
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
1776 CAPITAL FINANCE, LLC v. ADMI, INC. et al
as 5:2024cv02667
Plaintiff:
1776 CAPITAL FINANCE, LLC
Defendant:
ADMI, INC. and Allen Moyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
INTERDATE S.A. et al v. AKROSE LABS, INC.
as 3:2024cv02671
Plaintiff:
INTERDATE S.A. and BE2 SARL
Defendant:
ARKOSE LABS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
GREGG v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al
as 5:2024cv02679
Plaintiff:
STACY GREGG
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY and CAPITOL FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
