US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 101 - 110 of 153,656
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Zhang et al v. Google LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02531
Plaintiff:
Jingna Zhang, Sarah Andersen, Hope Larson and others
Defendant:
Google LLC and Alphabet Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Klobus v. Akero Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02534
Plaintiff:
Dora Klobus
Defendant:
Akero Therapeutics, Inc., Andrew Cheng, William White and others
The Clorox Company v. Odyssey Manufacturing Co.
as 3:2024mc80096
Petitioner:
The Clorox Company
Respondent:
Odyssey Manufacturing Co.
Kirwan v. The United States of America
as 3:2024cv02519
Plaintiff:
Gerald Maurice Kirwan
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
D. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02511
Plaintiff:
P. D.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gold v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02512
Plaintiff:
Michelle Gold
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Castronuova v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02523
Plaintiff:
Cara Castronuova
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., X Corp, Vivek Murthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Zinnerman v. Starbucks Corporation
as 3:2024cv02530
Plaintiff:
Angela Zinnerman
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
