California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 5,982
Cervantes v. USA
as 4:2022cv08658
Petitioner:
Henry Cervantes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Daliang Guo v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv09025
Petitioner:
Daliang Guo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Cubby Wayne Williams v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv08894
Petitioner:
Cubby Wayne Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Duren v. USA
as 3:2022cv01939
Petitioner:
Tyrone Cedric Duren
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Christopher Myung Kim v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv09070
Petitioner:
Christopher Myung Kim
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ganesh v. USA
as 5:2022cv07708
Petitioner:
Vilasini Ganesh
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Temitope Akintonde v. USA
as 3:2022cv01883
Petitioner:
Olatunde James Temitope Akintonde
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Williams v. USA
as 3:2022cv07124
Petitioner:
Lindsay Bain Muniz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Muniz v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv07116
Petitioner:
Lindsay Bain Muniz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cosmin Spiridon v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv08162
Petitioner:
Cosmin Spiridon
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
