California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 5,982
Federico v. USA
as 4:2022cv06774
Petitioner:
Brian Federico
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vasquez v. USA
as 1:2022cv01393
Petitioner:
Joseph Vasquez, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodriguez v. USA
as 4:2022cv06506
Petitioner:
Caballo and Jose De Jesus Garcia Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Carlos Alexandre Viana Grossi v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv07845
Petitioner:
Carlos Alexandre Viana Grossi
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
William Elam v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv08031
Petitioner:
William Elam
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
John Anthony Terrones v. United States of America
as 8:2022cv01947
Petitioner:
John Anthony Terrones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jesus Eric Carasco v. United States of America
as 8:2022cv01946
Petitioner:
Jesus Eric Carasco
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Warren v. USA
as 2:2022cv01858
Petitioner:
Jeremy Ray Warren
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rosember Jiminez Jr. v. United States of America
as 8:2022cv01908
Petitioner:
Rosember Jiminez, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lee v. USA
as 3:2022cv06076
Petitioner:
Jason Lee
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
