California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 55,784
Avila v. Guzman
as 3:2024cv00616
Petitioner:
Perry Robert Avila
Respondent:
Fidencio Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grigoryan v. Macomber
as 3:2024cv00619
Petitioner:
Aznaur Grigoryan
Respondent:
Jeff Macomber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Samuel Good Jr v. People of State of California
as 2:2024cv02649
Petitioner:
Samuel Good, Jr.
Respondent:
People of State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Julio Espinoza Preciado v. Warden
as 2:2024cv02663
Plaintiff:
Julio Espinoza Preciado
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(HC) Harris v. Pfeifer et al
as 1:2024cv00361
Petitioner:
Ernest Harris
Respondent:
C. Pfeifer, M. Melendrez and Cortez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Barefield v. Covello
as 2:2024cv00945
Petitioner:
Michael S. Barefield, Sr.
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC) Ramos v. Tyler
as 2:2024cv00946
Petitioner:
Salvador Ramos
Respondent:
Thomas Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) KasenzangaKhona v. Cano et al
as 1:2024cv00358
Petitioner:
Shakazulu Sigidi KasenzangaKhona
Respondent:
L. Cano, Lozano, De La Torree and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonilla v. Chhabria
as 4:2024cv01854
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Vince Chhabria
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon J. Franklin v. Salinas Valley State Prison
as 5:2024cv00647
Petitioner:
Brandon J. Franklin
Respondent:
Salinas Valley State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
