California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 47,227
Bonilla v. Santa Clara County Superior Court
as 4:2024cv02632
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Santa Clara County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Dauwalder v. Atherton et al
as 1:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dauwalder
Defendant:
J. Atherton, J. Perez, Rostislav Davydov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv01278
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
Clayburne Williams and Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Powell et al
as 2:2024cv01279
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
B. Powell, S. Arana and D. Caraballo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Azpera v. Campos et al
as 2:2024cv01285
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Azpera
Defendant:
J. Campos and G. Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Nieto v. Allison et al
as 4:2024cv02628
Plaintiff:
Deputy D.A. Michael Nieto
Defendant:
Warden Kathleen Allison, Hernandez, Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Calderon v. Covello
as 2:2024cv01309
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Calderon
Defendant:
P. Covello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Lipsey Jr. v. Lancaster State Prison Warden Lundy et al
as 2:2024cv03716
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lipsey, Jr
Defendant:
Lancaster State Prison Warden Lundy, Captain Z. Soisuvarn, Lieutenant A. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castro v. Gipson et al
as 3:2024cv00789
Defendant:
Surkhi, Connie Gipson, J. Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Castro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Nible v. Macomber et al
as 2:2024cv01259
Plaintiff:
William Lyle Nible
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber and Tommee Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
