California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 47,262
Zinman v. CDCR Personnel et al
as 2:2024cv01305
Plaintiff:
Justin Marcus Zinman
Defendant:
CDCR Personnel, P. Llamas, J. Sherman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Ford v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Marcel D. Ford
Defendant:
Slyvester Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Ellis v. El Dorado County Probation Dept.
as 2:2024cv01302
Plaintiff:
Peter Ellis
Defendant:
El Dorado County Probation Department and El Dorado County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rollen v. Hicks
as 2:2024cv01303
Plaintiff:
Van Keyshone Rollen
Defendant:
A. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Zinman v. Llamas et al
as 1:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Justin Marcus Zinman Doing business as American Media Intelligence
Defendant:
P. Llamas, J. Sherman, Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Davis v. Mandrigal et al
as 2:2024cv01296
Plaintiff:
Maurice Daronte Davis
Defendant:
Z. Mandrigal, T. Harris, Hamblin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Scott v. Padilla
as 2:2024cv01297
Plaintiff:
Jamurl A. Scott
Defendant:
Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Veach et al
as 3:2024cv00800
Plaintiff:
Billy L. Collins
Defendant:
Veach, C. York, J. Marfil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquice Bruce v. Twin Towers County Facility
as 5:2024cv00952
Plaintiff:
Marquice Bruce
Defendant:
Twin Towers County Facility, Leora, Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Martinez, Jr. v. Pogue et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Joe Martinez, Jr.
Defendant:
Tyson Pogue, Jason Quick, Alva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
