US District Court for the District of Oregon Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 4,325
Taylor v. Coates
as 2:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor doing business as New Muslim Party
Defendant:
Ta-Nehisi Coates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pablo-Rodas v. Reyes et al
as 2:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
David Pablo-Rodas
Defendant:
Erin Reyes and R. Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor
Defendant:
State of Oregon and Robert D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce
as 6:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swindler v. Hanlin et al
as 6:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Allen Lloyd Swindler
Defendant:
Sheriff John Hanlin and Clayton Ruble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tolbert v. Marion County Medical
as 6:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cortez Tolbert
Defendant:
Marion County Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Ally et al
as 2:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
Mr. Dontonio King
Defendant:
Sgt. Ally, Ofc. J. Verity, Ofc. Bourdain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turnidge v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Joshua A. Turnidge
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, T.R.C.I. RN C. Dieter, Dr. Warren Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Teague et al
as 6:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Allen Hamilton
Defendant:
Peter Teague, Walmart Albany Oregon and Michelle Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Case v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
David K. Case
Defendant:
Jamie Miller, Chris Shupe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
