Oregon Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 10,113
Bernards v. Prod Holding Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
Jacob James Bernards
Defendant:
Prod Holding Inc., Progressive Leasing LLC, Progressive Finance U.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beltran v. Salem Police Department
as 6:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Beltran
Defendant:
Salem Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. E.O.C.I. et al
as 2:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
Jermel A. Taylor
Defendant:
E.O.C.I. and Chaplain Zuleta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Fagan et al
as 2:2024cv00622
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor
Defendant:
Shemia Fagan and Lavonne Griffin-Valade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Roberts et al
as 2:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
William S. Boyd
Defendant:
Warren Roberts, Charles Cox, P. Maney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Coates
as 2:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor doing business as New Muslim Party
Defendant:
Ta-Nehisi Coates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00645
Petitioner:
Robert Vincent Clark
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. CNN et al
as 2:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Jermel A. Taylor
Defendant:
CNN and Fox News
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Oregon Corrections Enterprise
as 2:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Jermel A. Taylor
Defendant:
Oregon Corrections Enterprise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz-Gutierrez v. Marion County Courts
as 6:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Jose Cruz-Gutierrez
Defendant:
Marion County Courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
