Oregon Labor Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 82
Girt v. Oregon Eye Specialists, P.C.
as 3:2017cv00165
Plaintiff:
Terri Girt
Defendant:
Oregon Eye Specialists, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rozairo v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
as 3:2017cv00012
Plaintiff:
Yohan D. Rozairo
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Ellis v. Vial Fotheringham LLP
as 3:2016cv01945
Plaintiff:
Kayla Ellis
Defendant:
Vial Fotheringham LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Holte v. Peterson Pacific Corp.
as 6:2016cv01871
Plaintiff:
Shelley Holte
Defendant:
Peterson Pacific Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act Discrimination
Johnson v. Jondy Chemical, Inc.
as 3:2016cv01734
Plaintiff:
Todd S. Johnson
Defendant:
Jondy Chemical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Macy v. Waterford Operations, LLC
as 1:2016cv01675
Plaintiff:
William Macy
Defendant:
Waterford Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Christos v. Lifeworks NW
as 3:2016cv01586
Plaintiff:
Nola Christos
Defendant:
Lifeworks NW
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Duvall v. G6 Hospitality LLC
as 3:2016cv01571
Plaintiff:
Alan C Duvall
Defendant:
G6 Hospitality LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Nasario v. Pendleton Bottling Co. et al
as 2:2016cv01561
Plaintiff:
Ricky Nasario
Defendant:
Pendleton Bottling Co. and Dan Winters
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act Discrimination
Hernandez v. FedEx Freight, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01495
Defendant:
FedEx Freight, Inc., Rob Jasper, Tom Melder and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
