US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 194
Abeja, LLC v. Chateau Diana, LLC
as 4:2022cv05026
Plaintiff:
Abeja LLC
Defendant:
Chateau Diana LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
eSPRING GmbH v. NAR Enterprises LLC
as 2:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
eSPRING GmbH
Defendant:
NAR Enterprises LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Glacio Inc v Dongguan Sutuo Industrial Co Ltd
as 2:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Glacio, Inc. and Glacio Inc
Defendant:
Dongguan Sutuo Industrial Co., Ltd. and Dongguan Sutuo Industrial Co Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Doctor Danielle LLC v. Maryruth Organics LLC
as 2:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Doctor Danielle LLC
Defendant:
Maryruth Organics LLC and MRO MaryRuth LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Hempstract Inc v. Haynes et al
as 2:2021cv00258
Plaintiff:
Hempstract Inc
Defendant:
Gregory Haynes and Kim Melbye
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Northern Artisan Potables LLC v. Liquid Brands Distillery LLC
as 2:2021cv00241
Plaintiff:
Northern Artisan Potables LLC
Defendant:
Liquid Brands Distillery LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Thomas v. Chelan Spine LLC
as 2:2021cv00238
Plaintiff:
Colin Thomas
Defendant:
Chelan Spine LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Tabak v. K H Q Incorporated
as 2:2021cv00239
Plaintiff:
Alec Tabak
Defendant:
K H Q Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Revelry Vintners LLC v. Mackay Restaurant Management Group Inc
as 4:2021cv05110
Plaintiff:
Revelry Vintners LLC
Defendant:
Mackay Restaurant Management Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Doctor Danielle LLC v. Terra Origin Inc et al
as 2:2021cv00215
Plaintiff:
Doctor Danielle LLC
Defendant:
Terra Origin Inc and Pailla M Reddy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.