US District Court for the Western District of Washington Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 201 - 210 of 3,334
Tran v. Osler
as 3:2022cv05923
Petitioner:
Tam Tran
Defendant:
Kelli E Osler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tran v. Clark County Court
as 3:2022cv05924
Plaintiff:
Tam Tran
Defendant:
Clark County Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tran v. Hagenson
as 3:2022cv05922
Plaintiff:
Tam Tran
Defendant:
John P Hagenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spears v. State of Washington
as 3:2022cv05898
Petitioner:
Marcus Isaiah Spears
Respondent:
State of Washington and Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barajas Gomez v. White
as 3:2022cv05897
Petitioner:
Jose G Barajas Gomez
Respondent:
Dan White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Headrick v. Haynes
as 3:2022cv05895
Petitioner:
John Griffin Headrick
Respondent:
Cheryl Strange and Ron Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hagos v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2022cv01609
Petitioner:
Daniel Teklemariam Hagos
Respondent:
State of Washington, Lois Trickey and King County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Person v. State of Washington
as 3:2022cv05863
Petitioner:
Anthony Shrone Person
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. State of Washington
as 2:2022cv01575
Petitioner:
Anthony B Thompson
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lumpkins v. Bennett
as 3:2022cv05852
Petitioner:
William W Lumpkins
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.