US District Court for the Western District of Washington Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 191 - 200 of 3,334
Hagos v. Parton
as 2:2023cv00037
Petitioner:
Daniel Teklemariam Hagos
Respondent:
Suzanne Parton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hagos v. City of Seattle
as 2:2023cv00036
Petitioner:
Daniel Teklemariam Hagos
Respondent:
City of Seattle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Thrasher
as 3:2023cv05013
Petitioner:
John Garrett Smith
Respondent:
Thrasher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salas v Attorney General
as 2:2022cv01864
Petitioner:
Encarnacion Salas, IV
Respondent:
Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Thurston County et al
as 3:2022cv05972
Petitioner:
Jared J Bailey
Respondent:
Thurston County and City of Olympia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bianchi v. Boe
as 3:2022cv05957
Petitioner:
Ronald Jay Bianchi
Respondent:
Jeri Boe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quinlan v. Ferguson
as 2:2022cv01709
Petitioner:
Terrance Joe Quinlan
Respondent:
Robert W Ferguson and Rob Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rios v. State of Washington
as 3:2022cv05931
Petitioner:
Luciano Molina Rios
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hagos v. State of Washington
as 2:2022cv01697
Petitioner:
Daniel Teklemariam Hagos and Teklemariam Daniel Hagos
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tran v. Clark County Court
as 3:2022cv05925
Plaintiff:
Tam Tran
Defendant:
Clark County Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.