US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Cases 71 - 80 of 65,925
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01077
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lyons v. iFoodDecisionSciences, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01079
Plaintiff:
Sean Lyons
Defendant:
iFoodDecisionSciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Curtis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05586
Plaintiff:
Michelle E Curtis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Lee v. Metlife Home Loans et al
as 2:2024cv01081
Defendant:
Metlife Home Loans, First American Title, JP Morgan Chase Bank NA and others
Plaintiff:
Wendy Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Feick v. Brutsche Family Revocable Trust et al
as 3:2024cv05587
Defendant:
Steve Krohn, Resource Transition Consultants LLC, Kevin Hanchett individually and as Receiver for other Green Harvest Corporation doing business as Green Harvest Cannabis Company and others
Plaintiff:
Charles C Feick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05584
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Alaskan Observers Inc v. Charles Taylor General Agency Inc
as 2:2024cv01074
Plaintiff:
Alaskan Observers Inc
Defendant:
Charles Taylor General Agency Inc doing business as Charles Taylor TPA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Langton v. City of Bellingham et al
as 2:2024cv01073
Defendant:
Chad Cristelli, Donald Almer and City of Bellingham
Plaintiff:
Michael Langton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01075
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
