US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,937
Ennis v. Bolling et al
as 1:2020cv00366
Respondent: Steve Marshall, Leon Bolling
Petitioner: Stephen Gerard Ennis
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McQueen v. Department of Corrections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00362
Defendant: Department of Corrections
Plaintiff: Marcus D. McQueen
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Strickland v. USA
as 1:2020cv00352
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: James Michael Strickland
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Griffin v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00350
Petitioner: Miller Jerrell Griffin
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Fletcher v. Oliver
as 1:2020cv00347
Petitioner: Michael Shane Fletcher
Respondent: Warden Noah Price Oliver, Circuit Court of Mobile, Alabama
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barlow v. Wexford Health Provider et al
as 1:2020cv00342
Defendant: Wexford Health Provider, Stephen M. Billy
Plaintiff: Shannon Dean Barlow
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. USA
as 1:2020cv00346
Petitioner: Altavious Demon Jackson
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jennings v. Woodget et al
as 1:2020cv00325
Defendant: Sedricks Woodget, Jarmaine Bullard, Hasheen Bennett
Plaintiff: Nevis Jennings, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. USA
as 2:2020cv00319
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Willie James Lowe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bailey v. Peters We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00318
Petitioner: Paul Eugene Bailey
Respondent: Kenneth Peters
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?